
petri-meat.com

petri-meat.com
Posted by CMStewart on March 27, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/27/lab-meat/
In November, I posted here news that had come to me in a mass email from Las Vegas’ 3Dstereo Store, a report that Mattel would no longer produce ViewMaster reels that might appeal to adults. Today, another mass mailing from the same source brings more bad news:
Since the the end of last year, the news from the world of View-Master has been earth shaking, but then hasn’t all the news been earth shaking.
Scenic and Custom Divisions Close:
Late last year, Fisher-Price notified all its dealers that the Custom Division which encompassed the Scenic Division was closing permanently. All of its products, every scenic title of View-Master, and the Model L viewers will be discontinued. Custom and commercial reels will never again be made. The factory in Mexico where everything from Beaverton, Oregon was moved, will close. And the remaining View-Master products (children’s View-Master) will only be produced in China at the location that produced the poisoned Mattel/Fisher-Price toys which brought Mattel to the edge of destruction in the first place.
The economy can be blamed for a lot of changes in this world, but the demise of View-Master came unassisted at the hands of Mattel/Fisher-Price executives.
But one thing that Mattel/Fisher-Price will never kill is the joy that tens of thousands of View-Master collectors will always possess in the fascinating product that thrilled the world for 70 years.
Posted by acilius on March 26, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/26/more-on-the-destruction-of-viewmaster/
Posted by CMStewart on March 26, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/26/caltrans-eagle-cam/

VOTE ____ FOR ____
Posted by CMStewart on March 25, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/25/ill-take-a-bag-of-perish-please-thank-you/
When I hear this song, I make these same hand movements. The first time I did, Mrs Acilius laughed. All the other times she’s smiled politely and looked the other way. Anyway, there are three possibilities as to why these children do the same thing I do: (1) It’s a meaningless coincidence; (2) Mrs Acilius secretly contacted them and taught them to imitate me; (3) I have the mind of a small child and we all think alike. I favor possibility (1).
Posted by acilius on March 25, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/25/some-kids-singing-along-with-an-album-by-victoria-vox/
Posted by CMStewart on March 24, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/24/bush-truth-commission/
Robert Wright’s “One World, Under God” begins with the assertion that most New Testament scholars now regard the Gospel of Mark as significantly older than the other gosples, perhaps not much newer than the oldest writings in the New Testament, Paul’s letters. Mark stands out from the other gospels in that the sayings of Jesus recorded there are all quite harsh:
The Jesus in Mark, far from calmly forgiving his killers, seems surprised by the Crucifixion and hardly sanguine about it (“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”). In Mark, there is no Sermon on the Mount, and so no Beatitudes, and there is no good Samaritan; Jesus’ most salient comment on ethnic relations is to compare a woman to a dog because she isn’t from Israel.
The gentle Jesus meek and mild whom liberal Christians preach and the “great moral teacher” whom moderate secularists and ecumenical-minded non-Christians praise appears in the gospels of Luke and Matthew. If these accounts took shape as long after Mark’s as Wright says they may have done, then it is possible that they were influenced by Paul:
Of course, since Paul was writing after the time of Jesus, it’s been natural to assume he got these ideas from the teachings of Jesus. But when you realize that Jesus utters the word love only twice in the Gospel of Mark—compared with Paul’s using it more than 10 times in a single letter to the Romans—the reverse scenario suggests itself: maybe the Gospel of Mark, which was written not long after the end of Paul’s ministry, largely escaped Pauline influence, and thus left more of the real Jesus intact than Gospels written later, after Paul’s legacy had spread.
This hypothesis cuts against the grain of New Testament criticism, which at least since the Enlightenment has tended to cast Paul as the main figure in an effort to make Jesus seem less like a sweetheart and more like an apocalyptic crank than he really was. Perhaps the opposite was the case, and it was Paul who invented the idea of Christianity as a religion of boundless good will.
Posted by acilius on March 23, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/23/the-atlantic-monthly-april-2009/
Posted by CMStewart on March 23, 2009
https://losthunderlads.com/2009/03/23/tabbys-place/