The Nation, 12 May and 26 May, 2008

In the 12 May issue, Christian Parenti trots out the old case against nuclear power.  To claims familiar since the 70’s Parenti adds reports of the unpopularity of nuclear power and the consequences of that unpopularity.  Alex Cockburn quotes a RAND study suggesting that the rate of US casualties in Iraq is 101,000 killed or wounded per year. 

The highlight of the 26 May issue is a review essay about Knut Hamsun, prompted by a recent series of translations of his early novels.  Benjamin Lytal argues that the heart of Hamsun’s early worldview was his rejection of social responsibility, his extreme subjectivism and individualism.  This same solipsism, Lytal suggests, accounts for Hamsun’s pro-Nazi stand in later life.  Unwilling to pay attention to more than one person at a time, Hamsun felt quite happy with a regime that put all power in the hands of one person.  Hostile to everyone other than himself, he could support boundless violence against any group of people who differed from him in background.

The American Conservative, 21 April and 5 May, 2008

In the 21 April issue, Tom Piatak reviews Sidney Blumenthal’s The Strange Death of Republican America: Chronicles of a Collapsing Party, documenting flaw after flaw in Blumenthal’s analysis and pointing out that “any coalition that can survive the Bush presidency is strong, not weak.” 

The 5 May issue starts with a letter from former Harvard TA Christopher Livanos, arguing that “IQ tests are simply another form of cultural dumbing down.”  His students at Harvard all had very high IQs, but “Had I applied the same standards at Harvard that I apply at the University of Wisconsin, few of my students would have received a grade higher than C.”  Allan C. Carlson argues for a federal plan to bail out families with children hit by the subprime mortgage crisis, insisting that it is possible to devise such a bailout in a way that would not benefit big Wall Street firms or speculators.  Philip Weiss (of mondoweiss fame) writes a mash note to Zbigniew Brzezinski.  Matthew Roberts shows that street gangs have penetrated the US military, quoting a Stars and Stripes report to the effect that as many as 2% of the military are gang members.  Daniel McCarthy reviews a book that sounds terrific, Ain’t My America: The Long, Noble History of Anti-War Conservatism and Middle American Anti-Imperialism, by Bill Kauffman. 


The Atlantic Monthly, June 2008

A lively, pleasant read this month. 

Some articles about Barack Obama.  Joshua Green’s “The Amazing Money Machine” leads to the idea that no two successful presidential candidates use the same fundraising model.  Marc Ambinder’s “HisSPACE”, about Obama’s ideas on using the Internet to make government operations more visible, contains this sentence:

Communication and transparency are virtues only up to a point; as students of bureaucracy know, both eventually become an enemy to efficiency. 

But of course it is precisely at the point where transparency becomes an enemy to efficiency that it becomes a virtue.  The last thing we want is a really efficient bureaucracy.  An inefficient bureaucracy is a nuisance, a waste, a headache.  A truly efficient bureaucracy can make life so easy for its clients that it leaves them no opportunity to achieve or create anything.   

Transparency is like all other institutions of democracy: worth everything in the fighting for, worth nothing once achieved.   Even a moderately efficient bureaucratic system can absorb the formalities of democracy and domesticate them thoroughly.  Nietzsche wrote about this several times.  In Twilight of the Idols, he issues his customary harsh dismissal of the institutions of liberalism (“reduction to the herd animal!”,) but does then qualify his contempt:

As long as they are still being fought for, these same institutions produce quite different effects; they then in fact promote freedom mightily.  Viewed more closely, it is war which produces these effects, war for liberal institutions which as war permits the illiberal instincts to endure.  And war is a training in freedom.  For what is freedom?  That one has the will to self-responsibility.  That one preserves the distance which divides us.  That one has become more indifferent to hardship, toil, privation, even to life.  That one is ready to sacrifice men to one’s cause, oneself not excepted.  Freedom means that the manly instincts that delight in war and victory have gained mastery over the other instincts- for example, over the instinct for “happiness”… How is freedom measured, in individuals as in nations?  By the resistance which has to be overcome, by the effort it costs to stay aloft. (from section 38, as translated by R. J. Hollingdale in the Penguin Classics version)

Needless to say I would not endorse any of this without reservation.  But I do believe that the proper growth of the human person requires freedom; that “the will to self-responsibility” is a major part of freedom; that freedom can exist only where all power has definite limits; and that the only thing capable of limiting power is conflict with an opposing power.  Conflict itself, not documents or other formalized procedures resulting from conflict, is what ensures freedom.   

Gregg Easterbrook’s “The Sky is Falling” looks at the possibility of a disastrous meteor strike, analyzing as an example of inefficient bureaucracy NASA’s failure to live up to Congress’ mandates to map the inner solar system.  Locked into a metric which calculates success as a function of the number of astronauts deployed, the space agency wastes billions pointlessly repeating its Nixon-era triumphs, leaving undone work that might, quite literally, save the world. 

“In the Basement of the Ivory Tower” gives “Professor X” the opportunity to speak the unspeakable- some of the students he teaches in two-year colleges are wasting their time taking classes when they would be better off working.  Not that it’s their fault; jobs which never involve a bit of research or sustained sequential reasoning now routinely require four-year degrees.