Previous Post


  1. acilius

     /  January 6, 2010

    Excellent explanation! It shows that metaphysics doesn’t have to be hard to follow.

  2. cymast

     /  January 8, 2010

    Funny, I thought you would’ve given a science-based reason for the proposed validity of substance dualism.

  3. acilius

     /  January 9, 2010

    My only criticism would be the short time given to other ideas called “dualism” and of the use of “dualism” to mean “substance dualism.” Surely they could spared more than 1/4 of a second to acknowledge that the word has other uses.

  4. cymast

     /  January 9, 2010

    Spoken as a through-the-core etymologist!

%d bloggers like this: