A former US Solicitor General teams up with a guy named Srinivas to show that Indiana’s voting regulations make no sense.
All posts in category Current Events
Indiana makes Slate.com!
Posted by acilius on January 8, 2008
https://losthunderlads.com/2008/01/08/indiana-makes-slatecom/
Extreme Decision 2008 – Primaries
So what about the candidates?
Not an attempt to persuade, rather an unhelpful blathering of dropped from a helicopter on a snowboard-, restauranteur pioneer of Pripyat, Ukraine-style observations of their current standing. In other words, more of what you see on TV, only bloggy-style:
- Obama: Speaks very well, in line with values of many, yet enough folks are still too prejudiced and others are secretly afraid he won’t stand up against a Republican monster.
- Biden: Oh, please! This is where I put the expression “jacking your dick” because it belongs somewhere.
- Edwards: Doesn’t inspire enough passion. He articulates many things people want done but no one believes he can get them done.
- Richardson: Seems like he’d be a solid cabinet member once Clinton wins.
- Kucinich: Another place, another time…
- Clinton: Tremendous lead among mainstream and corporate interests. Not offensive enough to drive off everyone else who’s pissed and demands change.
- Paul: Attacked viciously because he loudly proclaims the popular will on major issues. Can’t have that! Very good chance he’ll be a 3rd party spoiler and screw everything up for the Democrats.
- Giuliani: Charisma and bald confidence will get you a lot of places (see Bush Jr.) but there’s plenty more mud headed his way. Not acceptable to the loud minorities of Republicans, too vulnerable on too much.
- Romney: 3-way furball between these last. Slip-ups will dog Romney and prejudice will play a role here, probably wrongly. (There are a lot of bizarre Christians who are decent people in their private lives and who insist on screwing up the private lives of others, he doesn’t deserve singling out for those qualities)
- Huckabee: The kind of unkind conservative Republicans love. McCain’s biggest competition from the values voters. Could make it.
- McCain: Momentum will build when the media realizes all that hugging with Bush means “Old Freaky” has plenty of support where he needs it. The aroma of a “comeback” story will be intoxicating. A survivor, a veteran, and a dirk-carrying operator with the best chance.
Posted by vthunderlad on December 24, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/12/24/extreme-decision-2008-primaries/
Crackpot Realism
Via antiwar.com:
In 1958, the New Left sociologist C. Wright Mills made a seminal contribution to political science in his book The Causes of World War Three by introducing the concept of “crackpot realism.” He applied the notion specifically to the intellectual outlook of top government officials, especially the ones known as the “serious people,” who have proven their capacity for dealing with important practical affairs by, say, managing a giant corporation, such as Halliburton or G. D. Searle, or a huge educational institution, such as Texas A&M University or the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
Mills’s key insight was that although such people have indeed been movers and shakers, they have moved and shaken within such a constricted milieu of experience and training that in most respects they are fools. Despite having developed supreme confidence in their own judgment and a corresponding contempt for other people’s views, they are astonishingly ignorant of many workaday aspects of the world and bewildered in the face of unexpected difficulties. As government leaders responsible for matters of war and peace, they have a tendency to paint themselves into corners of their own making and, then, seeing no way out, to conclude that their only escape lies in dropping bombs on somebody. As Mills observed, “instead of the unknown fear, the anxiety without end, some men of the higher circles prefer the simplification of known catastrophe.”
From Robert Higgs (a crackpot himself, but one who was capable of writing a good column) at http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs68.html.
Posted by acilius on November 20, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/11/20/crackpot-realism/
The Nation, 15 October 2007
Two pieces deal with the likelihood that rightists will spend the next few decades trying to convince themselves and the voting public that the reason the war in Iraq was such a disaster was that the left stabbed America in the back. A column by Eric Alterman compares the rumblings to this effect that we have already heard to the Nazi movement’s claim that Germany’s defeat in the 1914-1918 War was due to a Jewish plot to stab the country in the back. A review essay by Rick Perlstein takes on recent books claiming that the USA was at some point close to success in Vietnam, dismantling the scholarly pretensions of these books and using Elizabeth Kubler-Ross’ theory of the stages of grief to argue that when an American military intervention turns out badly, hawks “begin with denial, anger, and bargaining, just like you and me. And that’s where they stay- forever paralyzed by a petulant refusal to acknowledge their fantasy’s passing, a simple inability to process reality.”
The article that made me the angriest documented a systematic effort on the part of the army to pressure doctors to misdiagnose wounded Iraq vets so that they would not qualify for disability benefits. Hardly less angering was an article about the immunity that mercenary gangs like Blackwater Corporation enjoy for murders and other crimes committed in Iraq.
The closest thing to light entertainment in the issue was Jane Smiley’s review of the memoirs of Frank Schaeffer, son of Francis and Edith Schaeffer, two of the founders of the contemporary Christian Right. Schaeffer’s rebellion against his parents’ beliefs and his horrifying descriptions of the personalities of leading evangelists seem to be part of a lively, interesting personality.
Posted by acilius on October 2, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/10/02/the-nation-15-october-2007/
The American Conservative, 8 October 2007
Andrew Bacevich, a retired colonel best known as the author of The New American Militarism, excoriates General David Petraeus’ recent Congressional testimony, pointing out that if Petraeus were correct and the “surge” were working, then his recommendation that it be discontinued would be preposterous. Bacevich argues that the elite in Washington is driven chiefly by the fear of admitting that it was wrong. After reviewing Petraeus’ arguments and contrasting his views with the more cautious pronouncements of other senior commanders, Bacevich concludes:
Politically, it qualifies as a brilliant maneuver. The general’s relationships with official Washington remain intact. Yet he has broken faith with the soldiers he commands and the Army to which he has devoted his life. He has failed his country. History will not judge him kindly.
American debates on foreign policy are usually conducted in terms of two, and only two, historical analogies: Munich and Vietnam. Not only do these analogies grow tiresome, but their use in debate rests on an absurd set of oversimplifications. Those tired of this idiocy may welcome Paul W. Schroeder’s “Fire Fight.” Schroeder compares the current position of the USA in Iraq to the position of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in Italy in the period 1848-1859. Not only does Schroeder draw out intriguing parallels between the way the Hapsburgs weakened themselves by wasting their resources in an unwinnable war in Italy and the way in which America is weakening itself in Iraq, he also acknowledges what the Munich–Vietnam shouters usually overlook, that an analogy is a comparison between things which are in other respects dissimilar. Given that definition, a “perfect analogy” is a contradiction in terms. Schroeder specifies the limits within which analogy is useful.
Other highlights include Philip Weiss, keeper of the mondoweiss blog, on the apparent inability of the organization Freedom Watch to specify its relationship with the Bush administration or its policy towards Israel; Kelley Beaucar Vlahos on neoconservatives among the top advisors to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama; and Pat Buchanan on the future of Belgium.
Posted by acilius on October 2, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/10/02/the-american-conservative-8-october-2007/
Lonely Candidate
Via Wonkette, a strangely funny political website.
Posted by acilius on September 26, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/09/26/lonely-candidate/
Universalized Conscriptionment
It’s necessary ASAP. How else to get the country to move beyond caring and moping about to mobilizing against war? Plus, if we believe ourselves to be a powerful force for good we should have plenty more combat troops to enforce our goodness.
I’m not kidding.
(Title Bushinated so’s our children and leaders can understand. – Earl)
Posted by vthunderlad on September 14, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/09/14/universalized-conscriptionment/
A provocation from Mencius Moldbug
Lefalcon seems to be interested in “political theology,” the notion that all political ideologies are really religious doctrines in disguise. Below, Mencius Moldbug of the “Unqualified Reservations” blog tries to identify the religious doctrine behind the liberal internationalism that animates supporters of things like NATO, the UN, etc.
http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/universalism-postwar-progressivism-as.html
If you don’t want to follow the link, I’ll put the key paragraphs after the jump:
Posted by acilius on September 13, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/09/13/a-provocation-from-mencius-moldbug/
Bush’s logical successor
Courtesy of Wonkette, a photo of the candidate the Republican Party wishes it could might as well try to put in the White House in 2008.
Posted by acilius on September 8, 2007
https://losthunderlads.com/2007/09/08/bushs-logical-successor/

