Some funny stuff from Cracked: “14 Photographs That Shatter Your Image of Famous People“; “5 Dismissive Arguments You Only Use When You’re Wrong“; “6 Famous Things From History That Didn’t Actually Exist”
Stan Carey tells an old joke.
Something that would be true if it were true that “empathy is the source of ethics” (SMBC.)
Thomas Nagel drives some people so crazy that they’re willing to endorse statements like this: “The view that all sciences are in principle reducible to the laws of physics must be true unless you’re religious.” (The Weekly Standard) A hundred years ago, it seemed that only supernaturalists could doubt that arithmetic was in principle reducible to formal logic. Then along came Gödel, and it became obvious, first, that arithmetic was not reducible to formal logic, and, second, that such irreducibility implied absolutely nothing about the supernatural. In those same days, Free Will and Determinism was a big debate, with Determinists claiming that only in a perfectly predictable universe could rationality function. Then physics demonstrated that the universe is far from perfectly predictable, and rationality didn’t seem any the worse for it. Indeed, over the years so many reductionist theories that were once proposed as the only possible worldview for a rational person have been exploded that anyone saying “The view that x is in principle reducible to y must be true unless you’re religious” at once bears the burden of proving that s/he is not a dumbass.
How people talk about the secrecy that surrounded the Manhattan Project (Nuclear Secrecy)
Why do some politicians recover from scandal, while others are ruined? Noah Millman has a theory: “We are willing to forgive our politicians for a multitude of private sins, because really what we care about is that we come first. They can treat their spouses and children abominably if we know that at the end of the day all they really care about is winning. Because to win they have to do what we want. Or at least convince us that they have.”
Why you shouldn’t earn a doctorate in the humanities (Slate.)
Incompleteness: “It turns out that much of this common law of contracts was specifically designed around a particular standard-form contract. When the economist junked the standard-form contract and wrote a whole new one, he also (perhaps inadvertently) junked the common law that went with it. The result was that the gaps became a lot larger, and litigation more probable. The very act that was meant to reduce contractual incompleteness ended up increasing it.” (Volokh)
Anglo-American rightists have been writing love letters to General Augusto Pinochet for almost forty years. This article starts off like one of them, then runs into some actual Chileans who introduce the author to the ghastly realities of the general’s regime. (Takimag)
The group of researchers who coined the acronym WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) (Pacific Standard)