Negative numbers can be confusing
Posted by acilius on June 12, 2008
https://losthunderlads.com/2008/06/12/negative-numbers-can-be-confusing/
Previous Post
The Nation, 12 May and 26 May, 2008
The Nation, 12 May and 26 May, 2008
Next Post
Muslim women’s dress
Muslim women’s dress
2 Comments
-
Join 277 other subscribers
What we talk about
Follow us on Twitter
My TweetsPages
Tag Cloud
3quarksdaily 9/11 Abraham Lincoln Acilius Alison Bechdel antisemitism/ philosemitism atheism Bacevich banana art Bill Kauffman bureaucracy calvinism crackpot realism Darwinism disability visibility Don John of Astoria economics editing ethics etymology Eve Tushnet Games that make a point Gelman gender neutral marriage George Hinchliffe haha.nu Hester Goodman hillary rodham clinton inequality Irving Babbitt Keith Knight Language Log Latin lawrence dennis liberty mark p shea Martin Luther King Marxism matt bors michael brendan dougherty moral reasoning Nietzsche paul elmer more Peter Hitchens' less interesting brother Pets philosophy phranc Poetry political theology psychology quakerism rationality rod dreher Rome sailer search engines sexual morality slate small is beautiful smbc sociology star pilot Star Trek technology policy tom tomorrow torture Trade Policy Twitter Value Added Tax Viewmaster weirdomatic Willard M. Romney Will Grove-White Word lists xkcdWho writes this?
What’s on here about…
Month by month
- March 2023 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (2)
- January 2021 (1)
- November 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (6)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (5)
- January 2017 (5)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (6)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (7)
- June 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (8)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (3)
- January 2016 (9)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (7)
- August 2015 (7)
- July 2015 (5)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (7)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (11)
- December 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (3)
- September 2014 (6)
- July 2014 (9)
- June 2014 (1)
- May 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (5)
- February 2014 (9)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (4)
- December 2012 (5)
- November 2012 (10)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (11)
- August 2012 (12)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (6)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (16)
- September 2011 (24)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (11)
- February 2011 (9)
- January 2011 (23)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (17)
- October 2010 (10)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (15)
- May 2010 (23)
- April 2010 (22)
- March 2010 (20)
- February 2010 (28)
- January 2010 (40)
- December 2009 (40)
- November 2009 (20)
- October 2009 (54)
- September 2009 (34)
- August 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (29)
- June 2009 (27)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (42)
- March 2009 (43)
- February 2009 (74)
- January 2009 (37)
- December 2008 (61)
- November 2008 (62)
- October 2008 (78)
- September 2008 (52)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (19)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (4)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (12)
- August 2007 (6)
- July 2007 (8)
acilius
believer1
lefalcon
losthunderlads
vthunderlad
Panther Red 
cymast
/ April 24, 2009Well yeah, it makes sense. If it was $249.99 and now it’s $259.99 you save $-10. If every math teacher I ever had could see me now!