The 16-30 June issue of Counterpunch carries a brief article by Andrew Cockburn about US government backing for Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program. In view of the concerns top American officials have expressed about the possibility that Pakistani nukes might fall into the hands of Bin Ladenite extremists, and of the fact that Dr. A. Q. Khan sold Pakistani nuclear material on an international black market, it is sobering to learn of the extent to which Washington has been involved in the development of Pakistan’s arsenal. When CIA analyst Richard Barlow tried to blow the whistle on the US government’s complicity in helping Pakistan acquire nuclear weapons in the 1980s, his career was ruined. Even the Khan affair doesn’t seem to have changed the CIA’s attitude; indeed, Khan’s shipping manager was a CIA agent. The article lists an impressive array of malefactors involved in the business of promoting Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions. Some of them, such as an unnamed group of “Israeli arms merchants,” are accustomed to bad press; others, such as the Dalai Lama, usually get friendlier publicity.
The USA and Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal
Posted in Counterpunch, Wars and Rumors of Wars
Tagged Pakistan
Posted by acilius on July 8, 2009
http://losthunderlads.com/2009/07/08/the-usa-and-pakistans-nuclear-arsenal/
Previous Post
Don’t we all know how she feels?
Don’t we all know how she feels?
Next Post
Next Post
Next Post
2 Comments
What we talk about
Affiliated
Blogroll
- 1 Believer
- Alison Bechdel
- Apathy Sketchpad
- b4research
- Black Cat
- Doc Haagen Dazs' 1st Syllable
- Gelman
- Language Log
- Los Thunderlads on Twitter
- MetaWatershed
- Our Pandora profile
- Pandaemonium
- Schneier on Security
- Secular Right
- See Saw
- Sixty Symbols
- Small Equals
- Star Pilot
- Susie Bright's Journal
- Tenured Radical
- The Comics Curmudgeon
- The Long Black Veil and Life Within It
- The Monkey Cage
- The Vigil
- UkeToob
- Ukulele and Languages
- Ukulele Belgium
- Ukulele Hunt
- Understanding Uncertainty
- Weirdomatic
- Blog at WordPress.com.
- Your Dialogue is Unrealistic
Pages
Tag Cloud
3quarksdaily 9/11 Abraham Lincoln Acilius Alison Bechdel antisemitism/ philosemitism atheism Bill Kauffman bureaucracy crackpot realism Darwinism disability visibility economics etymology Eve Tushnet Games that make a point George Hinchliffe haha.nu Hester Goodman inequality Irving Babbitt Keith Knight Language Log Latin lawrence dennis liberty Marxism Nietzsche Pets phranc quakerism Rome sailer same sex marriage small is beautiful Star Trek tom tomorrow torture Trade Policy Value Added Tax Viewmaster weirdomatic Will Grove-White Word lists xkcd-
Who writes this?
What’s on here about…
Month by month
- April 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (6)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (16)
- September 2011 (24)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (11)
- February 2011 (9)
- January 2011 (23)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (17)
- October 2010 (10)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (15)
- May 2010 (23)
- April 2010 (22)
- March 2010 (20)
- February 2010 (28)
- January 2010 (40)
- December 2009 (40)
- November 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (54)
- September 2009 (34)
- August 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (29)
- June 2009 (28)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (42)
- March 2009 (43)
- February 2009 (74)
- January 2009 (37)
- December 2008 (61)
- November 2008 (62)
- October 2008 (78)
- September 2008 (52)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (19)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (4)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (12)
- August 2007 (6)
- July 2007 (8)


cymast
/ July 9, 2009I did not know the Dalai Lama was a proponent of nuclear weapons. I thought he was peaceful. ?
acilius
/ July 9, 2009He may be peaceful, but he’s got expenses to meet…